Skip to main content
Home
Human Rights
Police
Courts
Penitentiary Institutions
Tortures
Army
Freedom of Conscience
Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Assembly
Persecution
Cases
Levon Gulyan
March 1 case
Case of 7
Arshaluys Hakobyan
Mariam Sukhudyan
Khachik Hovsepyan
Vahan Khalaphyan
Artak Nazaryan
Torgom Sarukhanyan
Վահրամ Սիմոնյան
Հասմիկ Սարգսյան
Արթուր Ղազարյան
Կարեն Կունգուրցև
Յուրա Տեփանոսյան
Monitoring
Elections
Advocates’ Harassment
CMQ
Registration
Library
The Constitution
International Documents
Letters and Petitions
Reports
News
Statements
About us
HRTV
Home
Human Rights
Police
Courts
Penitentiary Institutions
Tortures
Army
Freedom of Conscience
Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Assembly
Persecution
Cases
Levon Gulyan
March 1 case
Case of 7
Arshaluys Hakobyan
Mariam Sukhudyan
Khachik Hovsepyan
Vahan Khalaphyan
Artak Nazaryan
Torgom Sarukhanyan
Վահրամ Սիմոնյան
Հասմիկ Սարգսյան
Արթուր Ղազարյան
Կարեն Կունգուրցև
Յուրա Տեփանոսյան
Monitoring
Elections
Advocates’ Harassment
CMQ
Registration
Library
The Constitution
International Documents
Letters and Petitions
Reports
News
Statements
About us
HRTV
Arm
Eng
COURT MONITORING FORM
Court Monitoring and Fostering Legal Awareness for Active Citizenship in Syunik
CMQ
Name
*
Name
First
First
Last
Last
Region
*
Aragatsotn
Ararat
Armavir
Gegharkunik
Kotayk
Lori
Shirak
Syunik
Tavush
Vayots Dzor
Yerevan
City
Artashat (Արտաշատ)
Ararat (Արարատ)
Masis (Մասիս)
Vedi (Վեդի)
City
Ashtarak (Աշտարակ)
Aparan (Ապարան)
Talin (Թալին)
քաղաք
Gavar (Գավառ)
Sevan (Սևան)
Martuni (Մարտունի)
Vardenis (Վարդենիս)
Chambarak (Ճամբարակ)
City
Vagharshapat (Վաղարշապատ)[a]
Armavir (Արմավիր)
Metsamor (Մեծամոր)
City
Abovyan (Աբովյան)
Hrazdan (Հրազդան)
Charentsavan (Չարենցավան)
Yeghvard (Եղվարդ)
Byureghavan (Բյուրեղավան)
Nor Hachn (Նոր Հաճն)
Tsaghkadzor (Ծաղկաձոր)
City
Vanadzor (Վանաձոր)
Alaverdi (Ալավերդի)
Stepanavan (Ստեփանավան)
Spitak (Սպիտակ)
Tashir (Տաշիր)
Akhtala (Ախթալա)
Tumanyan (Թումանյան)
City
Gyumri (Գյումրի)
Artik (Արթիկ)
Maralik (Մարալիկ)
City
Kapan (Կապան)
Goris (Գորիս)
Sisian (Սիսիան)
Kajaran (Քաջարան)
Meghri (Մեղրի)
City
Ijevan (Իջևան)
Dilijan (Դիլիջան)
Berd (Բերդ)
Noyemberyan (Նոյեմբերյան)
Ayrum (Այրում)
The name of the court
*
Court of First Instance of Ajapnyak and Davtashen Communities of Yerevan
Court of First Instance of Arabkir and Qanaqer-Zeytun Communities of Yerevan
Court of First Instance of Avan and Nor Nork Communities of Yerevan
Court of First Instance of Center and Nork-Marash Communities of Yerevan
Court of First Instance of Erebuni and Nubarashen Communities of Yerevan
Court of First Instance of Malatia-Sebastia Community of Yerevan
Court of First Instance of Shengavit Community of Yerevan
District Court of First Instance Aragatsotn
District Court of First Instance Ararat
District Court of First Instance Armavir
District Court of First Instance Gegharquniq
District Court of First Instance Kotayk
District Court of First Instance Lori
District Court of First Instance Shirak
District Court of First Instance Syuniq
District Court of First Instance Tavush
District Court of First Instance Vayots Dzor
The name of the presiding judge
*
The case number
The defendant/s
The sceduled date of the case hearing monitored
Time
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
:
00
05
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
The availability of information within the court premises
The list of staff of the judges / telephone numbers
The list of prohibited items
Prohibited item locker
The code of conduct
Clothing
Information signs
Accessability of the list of the scheduled court hearings in a visible place
Is an inspection of individuals or items conducted by bailiffs upon entering the court?
*
Yes
No
Please select detailed option
Applying gender concordance
Using static metal detector
Using handheld metal detector
Using Rapiscan scanner equipment
Was the hearing opened at the scheduled time?*
*
Yes
No
Please select detailed option
Due to the presiding judge
Due to the prosecutor
Due to the victim
Due to the expert/witness/interpreter
Due to the defense lawyer
Due to certain technical reasons
Has the case hearing postponed?
*
Yes
No
other
it is opened and postponed, because
The prosecutor had not appeared in the court room.
The victim had not appeared in the court room.
The detained person had not brought to the court.
The expert/witness/inrepreter had not appeared in the court room.
The defense lawyer had not appeared in the court room.
The technical equipment for examining the testimonies was lacking.
The case hearing was postponed without having been opened
Please describe
Were the litigants/participants/presentees notified of their rights?
Yes
No
Please select detailed option
The accused party
The defense lawyer
The injured party
The legal representative of the injured party
The prosecutor
The witness
The expert
Any invited specialist
Media
Court monitor
Presentee in the court room
Was the right to a public hearing preserved?
*
Yes
No
Partially
Please select detailed option
The presiding judge was against to video and photo recording of the hearing.
The defendant was against of being video and photo recorded.
The witness was against of being video and photo The expert was against of being video and photo recorded.
Other.
Please describe
Please select detailed option
The presiding judge was against to video and photo recording of the hearing.
The defendant was against of being video and photo recorded.
The witness was against of being video and photo recorded.
The expert was against of being video and photo recorded.
Other.
Please describe
Was the right to the assistance of an interpreter retained?
*
Yes
No
There was no need for an interpreter.
Were the legal professionals given proper time to prepare? From the point of view of the defense party:
Yes
No
Were the legal professionals given proper time to prepare? From the point of view of the prosecution:
Yes
No
Were the legal professionals given proper time to prepare? From the point of view of the victim:
Yes
No
Were the litigants provided sufficient time for filing motions? - From the point of view of the defense party:
Yes
No
Were the legal professionals given proper time to prepare? - From the point of view of the prosecution:
Yes
No
Were the legal professionals given proper time to prepare? - From the point of view of the victim:
Yes
No
Were other witnesses present in the courtroom during the questioning of the witness?
*
Yes
No
Was any kind of influence exerted on the victim by the court?
*
Yes
No
Other
Was any kind of influence exerted on the victim by the court?
Please select detailed option
The victim was unfairly blamed.
The judge used offensive language to the victim.
The judge limited the victim’s right to free expression.
Was any kind of influence exerted on the witness by the court?
*
Yes
No
Other
Was any kind of influence exerted on the witness by the court?
Was the parties' right to equal protection preserved?
*
Yes
No
Other
Was the parties' right to equal protection preserved?
Please select detailed option
The accusing party’s right was violated:
The prosecutor’s;
The injured party’s.
The defendant’s right was violaed.
Was the court impartial?
*
Yes
No
Please justify your answer.
Was the principle of presumption of innocence applied?
*
Yes
No
Please justify your answer.
Please provide any additional information you think is relevant.
Visual
Text
Submit
If you are human, leave this field blank.
Δ
Կիսվել:
Twitter
Facebook
Print
LinkedIn
Telegram
WhatsApp
Insert/edit link
Close
Enter the destination URL
URL
Link Text
Open link in a new tab
Or link to existing content
Search
No search term specified. Showing recent items.
Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.
Cancel
