News Archive

The Court found A. Besaryan guilty and convicted him to 1 years of imprisonment. Essential violations were noted during the whole trials, particularly during the first trial the judge did not present the parties, he held the hearing without the secretary, and also the trial was not recorded. During the whole trial the judge did not wear the judge’s cloth. It’s worth mentioning that he is the chairman of the Court of Shengavit district.

The Court found A. Besaryan guilty and convicted him to 1 years of imprisonment. Essential violations were noted during the whole trials, particularly during the first trial the judge did not present the parties, he held the hearing without the secretary, and also the trial was not recorded. During the whole trial the judge did not wear the judge’s cloth. It’s worth mentioning that he is the chairman of the Court of Shengavit district.

The Court found A. Besaryan guilty and convicted him to 1 years of imprisonment. Essential violations were noted during the whole trials, particularly during the first trial the judge did not present the parties, he held the hearing without the secretary, and also the trial was not recorded. During the whole trial the judge did not wear the judge’s cloth. It’s worth mentioning that he is the chairman of the Court of Shengavit district.

Essential violations were noted during the whole trials, particularly during the first trial the judge did not present the parties, he held the hearing without the secretary, and also the trial was not recorded. During the whole trial the judge did not wear the judge’s cloth. It’s worth mentioning that he is the chairman of the Court of Shengavit district.

Essential violations were noted during the whole trials, particularly during the first trial the judge did not present the parties, he held the hearing without the secretary, and also the trial was not recorded. During the whole trial the judge did not wear the judge’s cloth. It’s worth mentioning that he is the chairman of the Court of Shengavit district.

Essential violations were noted during the whole trials, particularly during the first trial the judge did not present the parties, he held the hearing without the secretary, and also the trial was not recorded. During the whole trial the judge did not wear the judge’s cloth. It’s worth mentioning that he is the chairman of the Court of Shengavit district.

On August 6 2008 at 14:40 during the trial of S. Ayvazyan, held in the Court of First Instance of Kentron and Nork-Marash districts, Yerevan Gohar Veziryan exhibited disrespectful behaviour towards the Court (judge G. Poghosyan). The accusation was fully grounded by testimonies of court officers. According to them G. Veziryan called the judge “schizophrenic” and “marionette”. However, expert V. Ninoyan submitted the results of video and audio expertise to the court mentioning that there were no such expressions heard there

On August 6 2008 at 14:40 during the trial of S. Ayvazyan, held in the Court of First Instance of Kentron and Nork-Marash districts, Yerevan Gohar Veziryan exhibited disrespectful behaviour towards the Court (judge G. Poghosyan). The accusation was fully grounded by testimonies of court officers. According to them G. Veziryan called the judge “schizophrenic” and “marionette”. However, expert V. Ninoyan submitted the results of video and audio expertise to the court mentioning that there were no such expressions heard there

On August 6 2008 at 14:40 during the trial of S. Ayvazyan, held in the Court of First Instance of Kentron and Nork-Marash districts, Yerevan Gohar Veziryan exhibited disrespectful behaviour towards the Court (judge G. Poghosyan). The accusation was fully grounded by testimonies of court officers. According to them G. Veziryan called the judge “schizophrenic” and “marionette”. However, expert V. Ninoyan submitted the results of video and audio expertise to the court mentioning that there were no such expressions heard there