Skip to main content


Հնս 19, 2009
The Court decided to dismiss the appeal claim and leave the decision issued by the Court of First Instance of Kentron and Norq-Marash districts unchanged. Thought the reasons sounded by the investigator in the Court of First Instance and in the Appellate Court were groundless, however a regular groundless decision was made. Many ample grounds brought by the defense side were not taken into consideration

Հնս 17, 2009
The investigator Karen Nazaryan made an appointment on June 16, at 15:00. He was late for an hour, moreover without letting the witnesses and the lawyer in, he told them that he had to leave and that they would make another appointment later. However, he did not make any phone call. The investigator K. Nazaryan simply refused to accept the testimonies of witnesses and said, “Why shall I accept your testimonies, anyway, you will say that A. Hakobyan did not use swear words, did not hit the policemen and did not throw a cigarette at them”.

Հնս 15, 2009
As on 16 June, 2009 the investigator Karen Nazaryan refused to accept the testimonies of witnesses (parents of A. Hakobyan’s wife) they had to delay their flight in order to be able to give testimonies, thus they had financial losses. The investigator was surprised when he saw the witness with the lawyer and had to accept the testimonies. As on 16 June, 2009 the investigator Karen Nazaryan refused to accept the testimonies of witnesses (parents of A. Hakobyan’s wife) they had to delay their flight in order to be able to give testimonies, thus they had financial losses. The investigator was su…

Հնս 10, 2009
On 31 May, 2009 A. Akobyan, together with the group of observers representing Helsinki Association, visited the polling station No. 8/23 of Malatia-Sebastia district, Yerevan. The members and the head of the electoral commission prohibited them to carry out the monitoring process. The observer group was taken out from the polling station, and the door was locked. Afterwards, they were warned about physical punishment. Regarding the above mentioned incident A. Akobyan made a statement addressed to the Special Investigation Department of the Office of Prosecution General of Armenia. In the mo…

Մյս 14, 2009
Therefore, the criminal case against S. Harutyunyan was discontinued. According to the judge’s decision S. Harutyunyan was in a mental hospital for rather a long time. He had been taken there forcibly in order to undergo forensic-medical examination.

Մյս 12, 2009
  The Armenian National Congress appealed to the Prosecutor General of Armenia, Police, Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia demanding to file a criminal case and bring the wrongdoers to liability.

Մյս 8, 2009
The interesting fact was that the judge stated that the carriers were packed and sealed according to the law, and he suggested the parties to be certain of that. The parties rejected his suggestion and passed to the watching process. The content of other carriers allow the parties to suppose that that they were subjected to montage. The examination of carriers represented as “evidence” is not over yet.